Universal Design New York
3 Principles of Universal Design


Purposes and History


Accessible design is primarily about court-enforced compliance with regulations. The regulations are intended to eliminate certain physical barriers that limit the usability of environments for people with disabilities. Historically, accessible design has focused on compliance with state or local building codes. These typically were based on the American National Standards Institute's requirements. With the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990 and the subsequent development of the ADA Accessibility Guidelines, accessible design has focused more recently on satisfying these minimum technical criteria to allow most people with disabilities to use most of the designed environment (Salmen, 1996).

Universal design is a market-driven process intended to create environments that are usable by all people. While considerations for people with disabilities are certainly necessary for universal design, they are not sufficient when planning and designing for the whole population. Accommodating the needs and wishes of everyone - e.g., children, the elderly, women and men - is also necessary for universal design (Norwegian State Council on Disability, 1997).

Acknowledging this greater inclusiveness, in the mid-1990s the Center for Universal Design in Raleigh, NC asked ten leading advocates to identify the underlying performance requirements of universal design. The resulting Principles of Universal Design (Connell, et al, 1997; North Carolina State University, 1997), developed through funding provided by the U.S. Department of Education's National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR), has since become the internationally referenced definition.

 

 

Salmen, J (1996). Universal Design: Moving Beyond Accessibility. Trade Press Publishing Corporation.

 

Explaining and Illustrating the Principles


These seven principles are not without their critics. Some consider them vague and difficult to understand. Others argue that they are more applicable to product and graphic design than building design. And yet, as evidenced by their growing international acknowledgement, these principles continue to maintain their status as the definitive statement of what constitutes universal design. This guidebook also acknowledges the seven Principles of Universal Design by explaining and illustrating their applicability to the universal design of the built environment.

On the following pages, each of the seven principles is explained and associated with a simple pictogram. When guidelines are listed in subsequent sections of this guidebook, the principles most relevant to each guideline are acknowledged through use of these pictograms. Both the front and back covers of this guidebook include a flip out page listing the seven principles and their associated pictograms that can be kept open for quick reference while reviewing the guidelines.

 

 

Norwegian State Council on Disability (1997). Universal Design: Planning and Design for All.

Connell, B, Jones, M, Mace, R, Mueller, J, Mullick, A, Ostroff, E, Sanford, J, Steinfeld, E, Story, M, & Vanderheiden, G (199). The principles of universal design: Version 2.0. Raleigh, NC: The Center for Universal Design.

North Carolina State Univ., the Center for Universal Design (199). What is Universal Design? The Center for Universal Design.

 

 

The icon for equitable use. It is a pair of parallel lines representing an equal sign Principle 1: Equitable Use


The building's design should make it equally usable by everyone. Ideally, the means by which people use the building should be the same (e.g., providing one means of entry to the building that works well for everyone). If it cannot be identical, the several means provided must be equivalent in terms of their privacy, security, safety and convenience. The building must never employ means that isolate or stigmatize any group of users or privilege one group over another.

 

 
Photo of a building which uses the delivery entrance as an accessible entrance
Figure 3.1. People who require an accessible entrance should not be exiled to a remote delivery area like this building does.
The icon for flexibility in use. It represents a spring Principle 2: Flexibility in Use


The building's design should allow people to use its design features in more than one prescribed way (e.g., providing a countertop orientation map that is viewable from either a seated or standing position). It should accommodate both right and left-handed use and be adaptable to the individual user's pace. The building's design should have the built-in flexibility to be usable even when it is employed in an unconventional or unanticipated manner.

 

 
Photo of a toilet seat that is height-adjustable.
Figure 3.2. A toilet seat that is height-adjustable can be used by people of all sizes and ages.
The icon for simple and intuitive. It represents a puzzle coming together. Principle 3: Simple and Intuitive


The building should make it easy for everyone to understand the purpose of each design feature and how to use it (e.g., providing washroom lavatory faucets that make their method of operation readily apparent and relatively easy). Moreover, its means of use should be intuitively obvious so that it operates as anticipated and, therefore, can be used spontaneously.

 

 
Photo of a tactile sign with braille information
Figure 3.3. The absence of detectable information makes these nontraditional elevator call buttons difficult for first time users with reduced vision to recognize.
The icon forperceptible information. It represents a human eye. Principle 4: Perceptible Information


The building should provide all essential information in a variety of modes (e.g., written, symbolic, tactile, verbal) to ensure effective communication with all users regardless of their sensory abilities. The information provided must be presented with sufficient contrast to surrounding conditions so that it is distinguishable from its context and decipherable in all its various modes of presentation.

 

 
Photo of high contrast signage hanging in an airport terminal
Figure 3.4. This high-contrast directional signage uses both text and pictograms to communicate to a wide group of users.
The icon for tolerance for error. This is representative of a life preserver Principle 5: Tolerance for Error


Ideally, the building's design should eliminate, isolate or shield any design features that could prove hazardous to or inconvenience any user. When potentially dangerous conditions are unavoidable, users should receive warnings as they approach the design feature (e.g., providing proximity warnings in a variety of sensory modes near the top of stairs.) The building's design should also anticipate accidental or unintended actions by any user to minimize the inconvenience and/or protect the user from harm.

 

 
Photo of a wooden walkway with raised edges running along the shore line.
Figure 3.5. The boardwalk has raised edges to prevent users from accidentally leaving the path of travel.
The icon for low physical effort. It is representative of a feather. Principle 6: Low Physical Effort


The building's design should employ design features that require little or no physical force to use them (e.g., replacing a traditional door knob with a lever handle that doesn't require the ability to grasp and turn the wrist). If a low level of force is required, any user should be able to engage the feature without assuming an awkward or hazardous body position (e.g., providing a smooth travel surface with minimal slope along the path of travel leading to the entrance).

 

 
Photo of a height adjustable sink. It also has knee clearance
Figure 3.6. This lavatory has up and down controls that allow each user to adjust its height.
The icon for size and space for approach and use. It shows two people of different height and stature Principle 7: Size and Space for Approach and Use

 

A building's design features should provide an adequate amount of space that is appropriately arranged to enable anyone to use them (e.g., providing knee space under a washroom lavatory to enable use by someone in a seated position). In addition, the space needs to be arranged to provide a clear path of travel to and from important design features for all users.

 

 
hoto of a father and his two children at a consession stand counter. Since the counter is of lower height, the children are able to lean against it and relax while making a decision.
Figure 3.7. The height of the concession stand counter permits convenient use by customers of varying heights.

The IDEA Center Logo. Click this link to go to the IDEA Center web site.
Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access
School of Architecture and Planning - University at Buffalo,
The State University of New York
Buffalo, NY 14214-3087
Tel 716/829-3485 ext 329 Fax 716/829-3861
TTY 800/628-2281